Encanto and the Inheritance of Love

Directed by Jared Bush & Byron Howard

Encanto presents itself as colorful and celebratory, but its emotional center is grief. The film opens not with magic, but with loss, and everything that follows grows out of how a family adapts to trauma over generations.

One of the most compelling interpretations is that Casita is not simply magical, but an extension of Pedro himself. When Pedro sacrifices his life to protect his family, the miracle does not erase that loss, it transforms it. Casita becomes what he can no longer be in human form: shelter, protection, and quiet guidance. The house anticipates needs, intervenes in danger, and holds the family together physically and emotionally. In this reading, Casita is not alive in the literal sense, but relationally alive, an externalized form of love shaped by grief.

From a psychological perspective, this tracks. Trauma often reorganizes family systems, creating structures meant to ensure safety at all costs. Casita is that structure. It is loving, responsive, and deeply invested, but also fragile. When the family’s emotional bonds begin to fracture, the house does too.

Another theory frames the gifts themselves as reflections of Abuela Alma’s perceptions of her descendants. Rather than innate superpowers, the abilities mirror how she understands and relies on each family member. Pepa holds the emotional weather of the room. Luisa carries the family’s physical burdens. Isabela embodies perfection. Bruno carries what no one wants to see. From a systems lens, these roles are familiar. Families under pressure often assign identities unconsciously, rewarding traits that preserve stability and sidelining those that threaten it.

Mirabel’s lack of a gift is not an absence, but a signal. She exists outside the system of specialization, able to see the family as a whole rather than as roles to be maintained. That position is lonely, but necessary. It mirrors what psychology recognizes as the person who bridges conflict without authority, holding awareness without protection.

One of the more provocative interpretations positions Dolores as the quiet antagonist of the story. Her gift grants her total access, information without consent, intimacy without invitation. In a family built on secrecy and appearances, that kind of power is destabilizing. Dolores hears everything, yet chooses carefully what to reveal and when. She shares damaging information casually, almost eagerly, while withholding knowledge that could prevent collapse.

Unlike the others, Dolores gains something from the magic failing. The end of the miracle relieves her of a gift that isolates her, equalizes her in a family obsessed with spectacle, and removes the hierarchy that favors Isabela. When the structure breaks, Dolores is no longer the one burdened with unbearable awareness. She is free to want what she wants without competing with enchantment.

In this reading, Dolores does not destroy the magic out of cruelty, but out of calculation. She understands the cost of the miracle better than anyone, and she is willing to let it fall. The most unsettling part is not that she hears everything, but that she knows exactly when to speak and when to stay silent.

Ultimately, Encanto is less about powers than about inheritance. Mirabel becomes the next matriarch not because she controls magic, but because she understands connection. She leads through presence rather than authority, through repair rather than perfection. When the house falls, she does what Casita once did: she stays, listens, and holds.

The miracle returns only after the family confronts what they’ve been avoiding. Love survives, but only when it is allowed to change shape. Encanto suggests that healing does not come from preserving the structure that once kept us safe, but from recognizing when it no longer serves us, and choosing relationship over role.

In that way, the film is not really about magic at all. It is about what families build after loss, and how love, when left unexamined, can harden into pressure. When examined with care, it becomes something sturdier than miracles.


Discover more from Charli Quevedo ~ Actress | Writer | Producer

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Share :

One Response

  1. Really awesome and interesting theories. I always thought Dolores was the villain and that Mirabel would end up being the new Abuela. Nice work!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Discover more from Charli Quevedo ~ Actress | Writer | Producer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading